SpiritSeeker

Why are you Atheist, Buddhist, Christian, Hindu, Jewish, Muslim, Pagan, or Wiccan?

Comments

I am a Christian because I believe deeply in the teachings of love found in 1st John 4. I believe that God is love, and that through having real love for humanity we grow closer to God. This has deeply enriched my life and hlped to shape who I am today.
[this is good]
I'm a Unitarian Universalist because (a) I'm convinced that there is something more than what we see and hear around us, (b) I don't know what that something is, only that it is vast and mysterious, and (c) I believe that no one religion can possibly have all the answers. We need all of them.

Hmmmm...I love this question.

1. I know that there is a higher power. I love science and I love the exploration of the universe we live in but the closer we get to finding out how things work - the closer we get to a higher power. For instance, we may completely prove the "Big Bang" theory of the beginning of our universe but what created the matter that caused the bang? What made matter out of nothing.

2. I am a Christian. I love the lessons of Christ. Love one another. Forgiveness. Equality for all. It is those lessons that I try to live by.

[this is good]
I would identify myself as agnostic. I've studied various religions, but haven't found one that I really believe completely.
However, I view Buddhism more as a philosophy, and when I first learned about it, it was the only thing that made any sense to me. I felt like a light bulb went on that was out for my whole life.
Great question!
[this is good]
I am Muslim because, above all things, I believe that God exists only as one being, that this being knows everything, including what is in our hearts. I am Muslims because Muhammad, peace and blessings be upon him, was a strong leader who advocated equality for everyone, including caring for orphans and not stealing form their inheritance, including abolishing slavery and female infanticide.

Islam speaks to me because I also believe that while God loves all "His" creations (God is genderless), He also holds us accountable for our actions. He recognizes that humans have spats of weakness and so it is our intention that is most important. God is just and fair, and we will be judged for our actions in this life, but God will not make a mistake in His judgment, and we will receive what is due to us. There are even passages in the Qur'an that hint that punishments for some deeds are temporary, and once we have finished our punishment, we will be allowed to ascend into Heaven.

These are some of the reasons I am Muslim.. there are many more.
[this is good]

I am Christian in that I accept the salavation of Christ. I do not follow the Christian man made churches who twist religion to manipulate the masses.

I have studied about Astaru and the Nordic traditions and feel strong kinship to them as they are a part of my heritage.

I am a Unitarian Universalist because I have such a difficult time locating myself in any one specific religion. Maybe it is better to say I am a panentheist which can be found in all major world religions but
continued (it posted before I was readed)....

Maybe it is better to say I am a panentheist which can be found in all major world religions but isn't a distinguishing feature of any of them (including UU).
I'm mainly Jesuit Catholic, but I'm also probably a bit Buddhist, Taoist, Unitarian Universalist, and Agnostic. I believe that all the world's religions are responses to whatever higher power is out there (even if it is just a unifying principle). Because of that, no religion is perfect, and all are useful on a journey towards God/elightenment/the Tao.

I associate with Jesuit Catholicism because that is what is most familiar to me, and it is the most comfortable espression of worship for me. But I don't think labels are the most important part of spirituality. People should just do whatever works for them, and by works I mean keeps them committed to truth, open-mindedness, awareness, and spirituality.

Pretty much any religion that (can) approaches God in a panentheistic manner is good in my book. :)
I was a Christian as a youngster because i was raised in a Christian home. We went to sunday school and sunday morning service, sunday night service, and wednesday night service. When i was four i had a religious experience of Jesus Messiah literally sitting down in the chair next to me in the room where i prayed, with my Mom, to "accept Jesus into my heart." His presence has never went away, even now i intuitively know that i am not alone.

After High School i determined that God did not have grandchildren. In other words, was this my own belief or my parent's influences? The pentecostal group i worshipped with did not have the answers for how or why life happened as i experienced it, there was a huge disconnect between belief and practice. I studied Christianity very closely, and discovered the Church Fathers, Reformed theology, and the Apostle's Creed. I was satisfied that this was a reasonable and accurate description of my experience and of the circumstances around me.

I am a Christian because i believe salvation must necessarily come from outside of humanity as people are wayyyyy to fucked up for anything other than salvation by unmerited favor. Every other major religion has some kind of string attached, Buddhism is basically a kind of spiritual atheism, and i trust Rationalism, which produced the three most bloody tyrannies of the 20th century, about as far as i can throw my car (right back attcha mr. Harris). That is why i am a christian.
Atheist. The reason? Not enough evidence. If you want specifics, dive into some of the posts on my blog tagged "atheism."
[esto es genial]

I strongly assert that atheism or at worst temporary agnosticism heavily favoring the probability of atheism are the only rational and logical positions to hold these days.

Why? Simple. The God Hypothesis.

The existence of God in/outside of our universe is a scientific question by nature; in that a universe with a divine being is dramatically different in composition that a universe without one.

Thus the question of God's existence is a scientific hypothesis, and one that should be broken in down into a null hypothesis (atheism) and alternative hypothesis (a god does exist) and weighted according to verisimilitude (verifiable truthlikeness). There is absolutely no observable evidence whatsover to suggest the addition of the God Hypothesis to explain our natural universe is justified. At this time, there is a lot of verisimilitude attached to the accepted laws of physics, the theory of evolution, and other theories that explain the universe and the life within it. Thus, it is only rational to currently hold that atheism appears more verifiably truthlike than any explanation of the universe that invokes an all powerful divine being.

I respectfully but strongly disagree with KatieKat here " For instance, we may completely prove the "Big Bang" theory of the beginning of our universe but what created the matter that caused the bang? What made matter out of nothing."

In contrast, the theory of the Big Bang does not attempt to explain how a universe evolved from "nothing". In fact, modern science strongly suggests that is impossible. One of the keys laws of physics is that matter is neither created nor destroyed, and in millions of experimental and observational data no matter or energy has been created or destroyed. Your argument sounds to me like a version of the Original Cause fallacy, where one makes the assumption that at some point our universe did not exist in some natural state, and was unnaturaly created. The fallacy breaks down quite quickly when you apply their own faulty premise: if your argument holds true, then who or what created God? If your answer is that God has always existed, Occam's Razor rule of logic insists you must accept the simpler and more explanatory solution, that the universe itself has always existed in some natural form. That is actually something we can try to falsify upon observation, i.e. by trying to create or destroy matter, something that has never been observed to be possible.

Remember, scientific theories are infinte sources of information, which means while they are very useful, it also means at least for now that no scientific theory is 100% definitively and verifiably correct. However, scientific theories clearly offer the best possible avenue for answering questions about our universe, including the God Hypothesis.

Drac

I'm a Unitarian Universalist because it combines the method of worship that I was raised with as a Lutheran, as well as the including a whole lot of different faiths in their worship. I really believe that no religion is "the only way" and that including all the faiths is a great reflection of that.

I'm Pagan because when I learned of reincarnation, the duality of deity, and also the Pagan way of worship, I just said to myself "well duh". It was just a perfect match with my ideas of spirituality and what Divinity is like.

Also, as a Pagan I practice alone. By going to UU services, it fulfills my need for community in Divinity. It reconciles all of my beliefs nicely into one package!

Mostly, I am a student of all religions in that I try to learn as much of their wisdom as I can absorb. I just primarily identify as a Pagan UU.

I have a hard time categorizing myself...

my question is why do human beings always need to categorize themselves as one way or another? i agree with some hindu, buddhist, christian, muslim texts but am not part of any of these religions. It seems the nature of human beings to form a group that is partially based on the exclusion of everyone else. In some extreme cases, a group will form and believe that it is superior to other groups. I think this phenomenon has some basis in evolution. Maybe, at one point, it was beneficial for people to identify in groups, so they would socialize and share food and ensure the survival of the species. In any case, the numerous times I've tried to categorize myself I've failed to be satisfied with the classification. Its complex-- I believe in God, yet I don't believe in God, I agree a lot of the spiritual leaders are correct and I think they are incorrect as well...the one thing that I will consistently believe is that people must help other people and love each other, with no religious strings attached.

How can you believe in god and yet not believe in god at the same time?
I believe in God and don't at the same, too. I think the problem is that we have been brought up for thousands of years within a monotheistic mindset based upon Aristotlean ideas as interpreted by the early Catholic church so get stuck in an either/or mindset: either God exists or he doesn't. It's very difficult for us to think outside of those sorts of categories but that doesn't mean that either/or is all there is. It is possible to understand "God is" and "is not" - but not from within the age old paradigm.
I am Pagan because I can feel the world breathe around me, sense a perspective greater than my own, a purpose, and paganism brings the spiritual to life in every second of every day for me. And it gives me the basic structure and freedom, without the heavy theology and bureaucracy of the organized religions.

I <3 the ancient teachings of Buddhism and Hinduism, the cultural diversity of the world, and welcome it all as part of the same tapestry.

My favorite religion is Vedic Hinduism. I might consider practicing it aesthetically if I weren't a critical rationalist.

The Upanishads as you probably know are likely the most important text of Vedic Hinduism. Atman = Brahman, where Atman is the self, and Brahman is the ground of all reality and existence; Brahman is uncreated, external, infinite and all-embracing. The Upanishads teach that the ultimate ground of the universe is one with the ground of the thinker and creator himself, and that Brahman is all things that are real. "Satyam": immortal, mortal, and that which binds the two (and all things) together.

My take is that Atman is you, and Brahman is all the matter and energy in the multi-verse; the trick is finding a happy medium between the two.

I believe in God because of a, b, c, and I don't believe in God because of x, y, z. There are two claims, God exists, or God doesn't. They are opposites, like yin and yang. i accept both and similarly accept the duality of God's nature-- he exists and he does not exist at the same time. with regards to time as a dimension, one may have God in one spatial dimension and not another dimension at the same time. This is a bad example, but it illustrates how God can be there yet not be there. And hence I can believe in his existence and his non-existence at the same time.
[this is good]
Exactly. Learning some of this the first time I felt my spiritual horizon really expand. I knew it wasn't a perfect fit but, wow, definitely something I enjoy learning about!
I love these really long responses. I'm an atheist because I find the existence of God (or gods, or the supernatural in general) extremely unlikely. Short and sweet.
a fine answer, but its the justification of that premise in a way that effectively repeals all the common counter arguments that can add to the length

I am a member of a Baptist church, but I don't consider myself a "Baptist". I am a follower of Jesus. I was raised in by churchgoing and religious parents, but as I've read the Bible I've chosen faith on my own initiative.

I know that God exists because I've felt his love through my whole life, and there's so much about this world that could never be explained by science or the humanities, or any human being.

You made it on the this is good page! Hooray!
Wiccan? what is it?
It is quite an honor to be on the "This is Good" page. I think the credit for that must go to all those who have posted here in a kind, thoughtful way. So Congratulations everyone!

Didiervall, Wicca is a rather new religion. I reviewed some books on it here and here and here. This thread is also cross posted to several Wiccan groups on Vox if you want to know more.

I almost linked to Wikipedia, but Religious Tolerance: Wicca is a better choice.
I am a faithful Catholic (the few, the proud) and I identify with my religion because it gives me a nice balance of Mercy and Justice. God isn't some teddy bear, but He's no monster either.
I also believe that the Catholic Church allows for more accountability among its members while still preserving privacy. My spiritual state is important to the whole Church and the whole Church can help me with it...I'm not left on my own with my "personal relationship" with Our Lord. Additionally, I do not need to acknowledge my sin publicly to receive said support.
Further, if one believes in God then Catholicism makes better logical sense if we follow what we know of God's nature.
Lastly, my Church is among the oldest continuous institutions in the West and perhaps in the world. I take a certain amount of historical satisfaction at being a member.
[this is good]
SpiritSeeker, this is such a great question! I'm going to favorite and come back and answer (and read more) when I'm not under the influence of martinis (guess which religion I'm not).
I am a Pagan because I feel a connection with the world around me, with everything. No rules, just right.

Excellent post. I was born into a christian family and was raised to believe their beliefs were right and all others were wrong. I was taught to believe that the devil had a hand in all doubt of faith, so I tried hard to not question. That is why I was a christian. Then I found some counter-proofs, a few white lies in their theology, and I began to disbelieve. Once a disbeliever I found I couldn't believe in anything for the same reasons, if I could find any reason to disbelieve, then it couldn't be the truth. I looked at a lot of religions, identified as an agnostic. A few weeks ago I realized that what I really don't believe in is a god or gods that take a personal caring interest in humanity, and decided that if I had to have a label, I really am an atheist in regards to that type of belief in or following of a supposedly caring god. I've just seen too much horror to believe in that.

As soon as I got to the point where I felt I could identify as an atheist I also realized that I had spent fifteen years trying to define myself by what I am not. I'm not about to head completely in the opposite direction by wanting to fit myself in another person's religious summary of belief, but I am ready now to stop resisting all apples just because I can find a worm or a rotten spot in each one.

I am atheist, because all religions attempt to explain the universe in human terms, which I cannot accept to be true. A stray asteroid could wipe out all life on Earth, and the universe would just carry on with no concern for the fact that humans once evolved here. No, the universe is about much more than the petty desires of humans. It is a glorious, unknowable mystery of which we happen to be part. To know that, and to marvel at it, is enough.
I am a Zen Buddhist. I usually practice zazen (Zen sitting) everyday. The thing I like about Zen Buddhism is that it's based on reality. It's not based on what we think about reality, but on what reality actually is. It's normal to have many different thoughts about reality, some may be true and some may be false, but what reality actually is is always true. There's nothing else it could be. When I do zazen it brings me right back to reality. Sometimes it's not the way I'd like it to be, but it's always just as it is. That's why I like Zen Buddhism.
I have no idea why I like my religion, or what it is exactly that makes me like it - but maybe that's because I don't follow it as I "should" (entirely). I'm Muslim, yet I don't even know how to pray in Arabic. I don't pray five times a day or anything of the like and I haven't had the chance to even read the Qu'ran yet (though I'd like to, but I can't read Arabic so I have to wait to get an English version...) However, I also don't let religion and religious beliefs get to me so much. I have no proof that God exists - or Hell or Heaven or anything, to be honest - so I won't say 'He definitely is there'... just like I won't say 'He's definitely not there'. I *think* He exists, but there's a huge difference between what someone thinks and what is.

But I don't let that bother me. Why care where I'm going to end up after life? Why worry about the point of my life and all that kind of crap? "Oh, dear, I swore! That's going to send me to Hell, that is!" I'm also not as unrealistic as my Christian grandmother and my Muslim aunt (both take religion TOO seriously, as far as I can see): they say that the Devil does everything bad in the world, and that God is all-powerful - yet he doesn't make the Devil do all the bad things. As far as I'm concerned, God does EVERYTHING. It doesn't matter if He's killing people - they're dead. Big wow. If everyone has to die, so be it. I can't change it, and neither can anyone else. So it's not worth worrying about. That way, I don't worry about every little action I make or every little comment I say - God has either made me do it, or He hasn't (in which case he's either not real or isn't all-powerful and so isn't worth worshipping).

And I'm quite happy with those beliefs ^_^

It is really difficult for me to describe my religious beliefs, because even I'm not sure exactly what they are. On one hand, I believe there is a higher power of some kind, but on the other hand, I don't think that it matters if I worship it "the right way" or even at all. I like Lally's description about how God can exist and not exist simultaneously in different dimensions. It fits the way I think almost exactly.

Philosophically, though, I consider myself a Taoist (along with a mixture of a few other things). It just makes the most sense to me. I was raised Christian and even when I believed in God, I was uncomfortable with the idea that anything could be completely good or, in the case of Satan, completely evil. I heard people saying, "How could a caring God allow evil to exist?" and my thought was always, "because without evil, He could never be considered good." Then, when I was about 15, I decided that I didn't want anything to do with church and that I really wasn't sure whether or not God existed. I was fascinated with religion anyway, though, so I studied them in my spare time. Eventually I came upon Taoism and read the Tao te Ching and it all just clicked. That's it, really.

Why... I believe that God is real because I've interacted with Him. Call it what you will. He is the one and true God, and His Son is Jesus, who is the Messiah. There is no other God.

Besides that, faith is faith for a reason... but I've never known anything to draw me into peace or purpose like believing in Jesus as Messiah. He is the light of the world, and nothing else has even come close. Some get mad, and with reason. Christians have been known for atrocities... but we're human. Christ was not a Christian, however, and as far I've seen He's been better to me than any person who I've ever encountered or known in my life. He is a constant. He's better than life. He is life.

C. S. Lewis, he's got a pretty good understanding of Christianity as I know it myself.
I'm Hindu because I'm Indian, and it's quite hard to separate the two in terms of religion and culture at times. What I like the most about my religion is that it's diverse; there are so many variations in belief that you can find something that fits you personally.

Me, I like the idea that all religions are paths to discovering god, that there's no true religion. Just multiple interpretations of the same truth. I don't exactly believe everything about Hinduism (like reincarnation, etc) but there's enough in there to make me comfortable. And on a completely aesthetic level, I love the multitudes of gods and colourful stories in Hinduism. It's like modern day Greek mythology. ;)
I am more than one thing. Raised Baptist, turned Agnostic, became a Humanist, (re)discovered Paganism...it's all wrapped up in me, leading me to Unitarian Universalism. I will be joining a UU church soon--next week. In terms of my own beliefs, I mostly identify with Paganism because I feel like merely stepping outside with bare feet on cold grass is in and of itself a spiritual experience, because out of every religion and belief system, the one thing that everyone can "be shown" is nature itself. To me, it's the one undeniable truth and that's why I'm drawn to it. (It's more to me than just that, but I'm trying to paint a picture here...) It feels right, true, and cyclical. It just "clicks" for me. As far as UU is concerned, I'm into that because I like the sense of community. In order to have many faiths in one place, I think an even greater effort is produced in creating bonds amongst each other and in overlooking differences. It's amazing to me and it is those kinds of feelings that attract me to it.

All of this is just my opinion though and based on why *I* feel the way I do. I don't mean anything as a generalization. :)
When pressed for religious identity, I call myself a Noachide -- that is, someone who observes the seven laws handed down from God to Noah. They're simply moral principles for living with a focus on respect and justice combined with a belief in God.

I was brought up with Christianity and explored a number of sects within it before I discovered that Judaism is where I belong. I started the conversion process once a few years ago but never completed it. For now, I'm comfortable simply being a Noachide in the Jewish community, but eventually I would like to officially convert.
I'm an agnostic, because I find the concept of belief kind of baffling.
I believe in God, but I do not believe wholeheartedly in any one organized religion. Interesting to read everyone's answers though.
[this is good]
What a great question and even greater answers. I became a Christian because that's what I was taught. I am a Christian now because I have thought through my faith. I like Jesus. He's kind of in-your-face, even rude to the religious elite, not a typical God character. That intrigues me. The story of the crucifixion is still the most compelling I can think of and it's meant to be an inclusive one.

I don't always identify with my evangelical Christian culture, although I know some amazing people who are followers of Jesus. Sometimes I find the ideological view point too neat and tidy for my liking. If I had a culture that I felt most comfortable in, it would be with artists, thinkers and philosophers, but I figure they probably don't care that much about me. Jesus does.
I am a Muslim because I believe in a higher power. I believe in Abraham, Moses, Noah, and Jesus. In addition, I believe that Muhammad was the prophet after Jesus. I also believe in reading not only the book of my religion, The Quran, but also the Old Testament.

I can identify with Islam because it strives for tolerance and highlights education. This religion tells me to improve myself first, to educate myself. Also, it encourages me to be more social minded, encouraging me to do good, to donate, to hold group prayers, to care for my neighbors and to look after orphans.

Heck, it's basically the basis of Hillary Clinton's it takes a village.
I don't know that I identify with anything, any belief system.. I suppose I think there is something beyond what we are living. I guess. Maybe. You know, a sort of life after the one we know now? Do I identify myself as some sort of religious being? No. I identify myself as human. I neither identify as Christian, Muslim, Scientist, Buddhist, or any other religious anything.
I am. That's it.
My husband defines himself mostly as Atheist. He finds the idea of a God a pretty hard one to imagine. That is why he defines himself that way. He says, "how could a God allow the atrocities that exist?" To each his own.
[this is good]
Well, my family is split between Judaism and Christianity. I was raised Jewish, but honestly, I don't consider myself either one. I wouldn't go to the extreme and say I'm an atheist just yet, because there very well could be something out there (or at least I would like there to be). I am, however, unconvinced. Is that a religion? :)

I believe in God because of the incredible unlikliness of the "coincedences" in my life.

I believe that the Bible is powerful because of the way it means different things to me at different times, and because I always seem to find what I need to read.

I believe that Christians have a bad name; that people think they are unforgiving, prudish, up-tight, shallow, self-righteous, and hypocritical.

And although this is sometimes unfair, I believe for the most part it's an entirely deserved reputation.

That's why I'm working on my own religion right now, and looking for people that feel the same way.

My name is Arska and I'm an atheist. It was a natural choice because I never was too fascinated by spiritual concerns. There's also a bit of stubbornness against Christianity (into which I was schooled) and a wonderful sense of irony involved in case I'm wrong: if I go to Hell for not believing in God, that makes me a martyr.

Interesting that you include atheism in the list of religions.
i use to be a muslim and now i'm an atheist. my parents are intense muslims and i'm an intense atheist and yet they still think i'm a muslim. they'd kick me out if they found out i was an atheist so i have 2 years left till i finish my optometry degree and then i'm moving out.
i feel that from the moment i could think for myself i couldn't take god seriously. when i look at the world, it seems ludicrous for me to think that god created it. first of all i don't think it is utterly possible for a god to exist represented by religions so that is out of the question. all the qualities ascribed by religions to god such as benevolent can't be possible if evil exists in the world because any form of evil existing in the world automatically suggests that the god can't be all good. as for god in the general sense (a higher order), i can't equally belive that because if man is a creation of god, what is god a creation of?
i have a million other reasons for my lack of belief in a god but that's another story. ultimately, if there was a way to prove god's existence, and it was proven that he does exist, then i will believe in one, but i think everyone knows that won't happen.

forgive my grammatical errors, i have to get to university. by the way, i'm 18 if anyone's wondering.

cheerio!
not that I'm gonna be screaming death to the infidel, but I do believe it's your own prerogative, which is why my parents actually gave me a choice.

I do understand the "intense muslim" stance some Muslim parents take. However, it's a thin line between intense and radical.
As an atheist my point of view is that scientists do not care really care about people who seem to debunk science and try and falsify just theories using unscientific methods. This is because it is a pleasure for scientists themselves to be researching in areas such as biology and physics and they do it because they are fascinated by discovering new things. Science is not trying to identify the origins of life and the universe, science is just exploring empirically what is out there and through thousands of years of this we have come to discover the origins of life on earth and that is where science is expanding - and yet scientists do not know things like how simple elementary sequences came together resulting in very simple DNA and hence the beginning of life.

Listening to religious people (especially christian fundementalists) who say things like 'where did the matter that resulted in the big bang come from? science doesn't explain it and that's because it's god.' These kind of arguments which are also used to argue against evolution are idiotic and ludicrous because the whole point of science and what makes science is that science doesn't know all the answers yet, and that's why it's called science, it is progressive and through time and after many years of proving wrong different theories and refining others, plausibe answers are achieved. i think people who are trying to debunk science and scientific theories are too impatient and want an immediate answer. people should be more patient .

forgive any spelling mistakes and grammatical errors.

cheerio.


[this is good]

Put me down as atheist. Why not believing in something that is not there needs a title, is beyond me. I wonder if they have a name for people who do not believe the Greek gods or Roman gods

I truly believe religion is a mild form of dementia. I had it force upon me in grade school and it took many years of deprograming to get over it.

We worked very hard insulating our kids from religion. They are both in their 30's and I know they are much better persons because they are not infuenced by any religious teaching.

Personally, I can not understand why adults believe some of the religious statements. Faith is a wonderfull thing, but you would think that after a couple of thousand years, with no one ever seeing anything to confirm religious beliefs, people would admit they had been duped.

But a savy business person can make lots of money preaching those beliefs, can't they?

I pretty much agree. Categorization is a drag, and most of the original organizational doctrines are arcane.

I believe in the earth, the sky, science, stuff we know, and in the comfort that there's so much stuff we don't know. I believe in being groovy and finding groovy stuff in the world, and in learning, and collecting wisdom while retaining a childlike wonder at how the tides work, and the beauty in the curve of a good baseball pitch, and the science of a good poem, the way paint colors mix, and biochemistry, even though I don't understand it.
[this is good]
I have always been a non-believer, even as a small, skeptical child. I've tried to believe in several different religious precepts and a variety of dieties, but it felt like faking it. A lot of non-believers talk about proof and evidence, but since faith is just that--a powerful, unsubstantiated belief, I don't bother with evidence.

In my 20's, I was in large commercial jet, crossing the Pacific. We were hit by sheering winds or a microburst that flipped the plane over and put us into a fall. While the pilot tried to recover, I, along with the 200+ people on board, had a good 2 or 3 minutes hanging upside down in my seat to consider that we were likely going to die. People around me were screaming and praying, but at no point did I pray or contemplate a god or an afterlife. After that, I knew my efforts to believe were in vain. I just don't believe in a god or an afterlife or even a soul in the spiritual sense. We are animals like many others, and all the good in this life must be created from our efforts to improve our lives and the lives of others. Similarly, most of the bad things in this life stem from our ignorance and fear and selfishness.
I am an atheist.

I was raised Catholic and educated in Catholic schools through high school, dabbled in Wicca/Paganism when I was 15-18 or so, have an intense respect and love for the Jewish culture, and a general fascination for religion in general. However, I look at all of them as one might look at history or sociology: fascinated, but somewhat detached.
[this is good]
(Hi. I got here by way of the This Is Good page and I think this is a great question to answer.)

I myself am deeply spiritual, but I don't follow the dogma of any one organized religion. My mother was raised Catholic--went to Catholic schools, pre-Vatican II--but for reasons of her own which she's never discussed with me in any depth, she stopped practicing for a long time. But as a small child, I remember saying my prayers at night with my mother--she had her own prayer which went "Good night, sleep tight, wake up bright in the morning light, to do what's right with all your might...and God bless Mommy, and God bless Daddy...(and so on with the members of the family)."

I think the "do what's right with all your might" part has stuck with me at a very deep level throughout my life, and probably forms the basis of all my spiritual beliefs, along with the strong belief that there is a God and that God is the manifestation of love. This core belief has woven through all my spiritual explorations, from going to different churches with my friends, pretending I didn't believe in God (it was a teen angst thing), exploring various neo-pagan traditions including Wicca, joining a fundamentalist evangelical Christian church, and a few other twists and turns.

At this point in my life I'd say I believe in God, and I believe in a divine feminine counterpart--a goddess, if you will. I also believe that there are spirit helpers and spirit thieves. I believe Jesus Christ was a prophet and that his teachings were valid (and I wish more people who call themselves Christians would actually live by his teachings). I believe divinity is immanent and indwelling, that every living creature and every natural thing on this earth and beyond contains a spark of the Divine; this belief leads me to a fundamental respect for all life. I believe in cultivating an attitude of gratitude, because even when things look really bad (and trust me, I've had some very, VERY dark moments in my life) there is something worth being thankful for. I believe in respecting the life you take (for example, if you eat meat) and thanking it for its sacrifice, and I believe in considering the short- and long-term consequences of your actions. I believe in doing something to make the world a better place, because even the tiniest thing helps.

So I guess that makes me a good Christo-Pagan-Hindo-Buddhist Shaman. :-)
Buddhist a) raised with Buddhism in the home and 2) in a home that stressed the importance of learning about other religions (some will argue that Buddhism is not a religion...that's okay).

Living in rural Missouri, there are not many "choices" between religions but you have no shortage of churches. Part was a completed year of Evangelical Catechism. While Buddhist practise was discontinued in the home (still in childhood), it's how I define myself (even though I sit irregularly!).

I was born and raised and continue to be a member of the United Church of Christ. It's on the far left/progressive scale of Protestenism. I question my faith in ways of being a follower/believer of Jesus in the way the Right wants you to do, but I don't question the lessons he taught us. We often say the Bible is too important to take literally. I was raised on the Good Samaritan story and the Golden Rule. I believe we have an obligation to be the stewards of those less fortunate and of our planet.

We have a proud history of social justice and being open and accepting to all of God's people and creation. First to ordain a black minister (1700's), first to ordain a woman minister (1860's) and first to ordain a gay minister (1970's).

We aren't evangelical and tend to keep a low profile. Those who want to find us, will. I joke that are the church where scientists and Democrats can go and be safe.

I used to think that I was disillusioned with God, but then I realized that it is those who call themselves His followers that disappoint me. God is real; religion-now THAT'S made-up. I suppose that Gnostic is a good term; the search for knowledge, and the divine spark that lives in each of us, drives me onward. Somenone once accused me of being an Existentialist. I couldn't run away fast enough from the church of my youth; my parents fear for my eternal soul.
I am a Christian, and believe that Jesus Christ was both man AND God. I believe His coming, life & death were prophesied (see one Old Testament example in Isaiah 53) and that each and every prophecy was fulfilled in the New Testament (too many scriptures to reference in this format, but if you want more info, drop me a line). I believe that He died on the cross to take onto Himself the sin of all mankind, and that He DID rise from the dead 3 days later. A really good book that lays out each prophecy & it's corresponding fulfillment in a very scholarly manner of forensic investigation is" The Case for Christ: A Journalist's Personal Investigation of the Evidence for Jesus", by Lee Strobel, as well as "The Case for Faith: A Journalist Investigates the Toughest Objections to Christianity" by the same author. [Mr. Strobel was not a believer in Christ when he began this investigation].

I distinguish myself as a Christian, but not religious. I have a personal relationship with God and His people. But religion, dogma, & legalism are man-made institutions rife with the fallibility that is inherently human.
[this is good]

I'm Catholic but I mostly identify with it because my entire family is Catholic. My parents and grandparents are immigrants from a very Catholic country. I thought about becoming Buddhist when I was 18 years old and eventually decided to stay Catholic since it's such a big part of my family celebrations. I don't buy into the doctrine blindly, though. I ultimately believe that a person's relationship with God (or whatever name you give to a Higher Power) cannot be defined or constrained by a title like Christian, Buddhist, etc.

[this is good]
I'm a Unitarian Universalist. I'm a non-theist, but I'm interested in Humanism and Buddhist practice. UUism, as you know, provides a religious space to work on building your own theology (or, in my case, a sort of nontheological theology). The various faith traditions within UUism are more than allies, too; we revel in, and provide support for, one another's experiences. I enjoy being a part of that tolerant, open community.

By the way, there's a Unitarian Universalist Voxers group here. We'd welcome new participants.
[this is good]
I am a hardcore atheist, who recognizes that religion is the true root of all evil, and will be the ultimate end of humanity, likely within the next 300 years.

There is absolutely no god, no higher power, no universal creator, no nothing. Religious people are brainwashed sheep whose faith in the giant boogeyman in the sky is most troubling, as those beliefs lead to 95% of all conflict and war.

I don't really mind people who choose to believe in a higher power. That's their business. It's religious people whose existence and beliefs are patently stupid, ignorant and offensive to me.
[this is good]
I'm an atheist. Why? Because logically there is as much likelihood of a god existing as there is of a unicorn living in my cupboard. My favourite quote from Stephen Roberts sums up where I stand on this:

I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.
[this is good]
I'm a Christian. I'm Christian for a lot of reasons.

One reason is because I actually have a relationship with God. He has protected me when I needed protecting and has answered my prayers when I needed them answered. He has also pulled me away from Satan and closer to Himself. I have nightmares every time I get a tad farther from Him and He gets rid of them for me.

I also think that if God didn't exist, there would be nothing. Come on, what do you think makes trees grow? And what tells our brains to process? And how do we have a mind? I'd like to see humans pull apart a brain and figure that out.

I also believe in the idea of love that the Bible promises. It's very comforting to know that there is someone who loves me, gives me courage, protects me, and sees me in ways that humans can't.
I am a Hindu and let me tell you something my religion my religion was created before any of the prophets were born and even before Egyptian religon and Greek. The word Aum or Om of Vedas became the sacred word Hum for Tibetians, Amin for Moslems, Amen for Egyptians,Greek,Romans,Jews and Christians and
[this is good]

Really interesting comments. I found this blog on technorati whilst searching up about blogs talking about religious differences and other related topics. I read through most of the comments, and everyone here seemed very eager to share their views, but what I found really cool was that, although the beliefs where hugely diverse, everyone had reasons why they individually related to aspects of their religion or their particular belief, but at the same time, they did not really promote or preach about their religion - only one comment stated that their religion was better because it had no strings attached. The majority of comments were about love, values, teachings and the culture of their various beliefs. I also came across a new term for me - seems like I should have come across it but I haven't before - Unitarian Universalism - which seemingly refers to a spirituality search related to the type of confusion I'm in with regards to the whole religion and spirituality "thing." Nevertheless, I definitely do not want to align myself to any particular way of thinking or term, especially one I only came across a couple of days ago.

So, as for myself, I'm a tad confused. Regarding myself: I was born into a Hindu family, and thus I've been surrounded by Hinduism and its teachings. My parents are quite spiritually inclined, and even though a lot of their beliefs seem to be derived from Hinduism, being very open-mindedtruth-seeking people, a whole other side of their values are from numerous differentsources like Buddhism, Christianity, the teachings of Sathya Sai Baba, and so on. My strongly religious maternal grandmother lived with us until I was about fifteen, so I saw her go to the shrine room in our house to pray each morning and night, and often conduct a ceremony. I've been involved in such ceremonies, and I like to learn about them, however I don't feel a real need to be a part of them since I think a relationship with God is personal. I do visit the shrine room on a daily basis because it does exude a feeling of tranquility and good intentions. I've been to temples many times before, but I haven't been to one in the last two or so years. I learnt South Indian classical music for 12 years - the songs are about, and to God - however I was mainly there because of my love for music. These are a combination of things that have influenced my thinking and bias.

So, I find that I really relate to Hinduism and I could quite easily call myself a Hindu, because in the end, the values and beliefs coincide with mine but there is also a lot of open-mindedness inherent in the religion. It's almost like Hinduism provides teachings and various methods (or ways of seeings) that allow people to have a relationship with God, and thus live life of happiness for yourself and others. However, that's only my interpretation of it. Like anything, teachings in Hinduism could be understood differently, or followed in a certain way without questioning, which could seem "bad" to me. I'll come back to this in another post. I want to use the word "therefore," but it's not like I"m putting forth a logical argument, but my conclusion is I feel uncomfortable calling myself part of any particular religion until I have a greater understanding of it (that's if I ever come to a satisfactory understanding in my own eyes). So, rather, I'd like to take what works for me with regards to God from religions like Hinduism, Islam, Christianity and Buddhism, and anywhere else I can, and try to live my life in way that would help others to experience (or realise) the grace contained in life in whatever way they do.

I'm not really sure, and I'm happy to admit it.

I am a Christian and feel that is only by God's Grace that I am truly saved from my sins.

[this is good]
I am B'nei Noach (essentially, a Gentile who follows some tenets of Judaism). For years, I was an atheist and vehemently rejected any sort of theism. I studied many religions; then I discovered Judaism, and this ultimately led me to an understanding of some very simple, universal truths about "my place" in the world, the concept of God--and something new to me: this thing called spirituality... A huge draw for me was also the ability to impart moral guidance to my young children, and some sort of identity, along with a POV consistent with modernity--tolerance, science, etc.

I'm very much a religious pluralist--live and let live. Don't condemn me for my beliefs, and I won't condemn you.

I may convert to (liberal) Judasim some day, as many do, which may explain why there aren't many observant Noahides in the world today :)
I consider myself Buddhist. I was brought up being Christian primarily because it has tradition in my family. I even had my confirmation, but with 18/19 I got interested in Buddhism through friends.

Many of those people I met seemed to be more confident and relaxed with themselves which kind of made it even more attractive. So at first I think I looked for a stress-resolver.

What I learned over the years is that Buddhism and the practice is soley based on reality. Sometimes when you learn a new practice, it is about trust to do it. But in the end you always "know" - you don't "believe" in something. You know from experience.

Also, you really learn a lot about yourself - which may sound selfish at first, but I look at it like that I need to achieve a state where I no longer depend on others to be happy and to achieve something. Realizing this and in the end (hopefully) achieving this I think I am a much better person.

Last but not least, I like the idea of Karma. I feel responsible for myself, my current circumstances and situation and don't shift the blame on others.
EWQ: that is a most excellent quote. Thanks.
[this is good]
I was brought up without religion, and I consider myself both an atheist and an agnostic. On the one hand, I subscribe to the definition of atheism in that I am without religion. On the other hand, though, I subscribe to the definition of agnosticism because I really don't think there's any way of knowing for sure whether a god or gods exist. I used to be a little more "devoted" to atheism (if that makes any sense), but I've always been spiritual without necessarily believing in a higher power. I'm at a point now where it doesn't matter very much to me whether there is a god. I treat myself and others with respect, and I do what I can to live a good, fulfilling life.
[참 좋습니다]
I'm an atheist---I've been one for nigh over three years now. Before that, I had a short stunt with Buddhism and a year before that, I was Christian since birth. So I've had experience with three entirely different religions.

I'm an atheist because I couldn't get myself to believe in God, where his very being is filled with numerous contradictions. And really, that's the gist of it. I'm a nitpicker, I will admit, and I find comfort in things that is proven, but. I also know that there are a lot of things out there that aren't proven. However, the reason I cannot find comfort in God or any other deity is that fact that I don't see how one being can control EVERYTHING. To me, everything lends itself to each other---nothing can exist without the help of something else. In short, nothing can be all-powerful.

I also don't like religious fanaticals, which does nothing for the "relationship" between religion and I. They bother me, because I simply don't want to understand why they won't try to see the other side of the story, if you will. :/ And they sort of smudge the good name of those who ARE good religious people, which just really irks me.

I see myself as a scholar---I like religion solely for learning all about it. It has nothing to do with faith for me; it's all about the knowledge. And I for one am a complete knowledge hog. ;) For those who find comfort in religion, lovely! :D It's nice to know that religion provides comfort to those who need and want it. The fact still remains that it does nothing whatsoever to me. I like to control my own fate/life/etc. you see.

Besides, if I ever have any desire to go back into religion, it would definitely be Buddhism. Very peaceful and one point of said religion is to rid yourself of selfish desires, which is a goal I very much admire, among other things. :) I attend Buddhist sessions since my mum is Buddhist [when I converted from Christianity I went to Buddhism with her] and it's a very serene, clean feeling you get. Plus, my mum has definitely improved and moved on. :D

So yeah, religion is helpful to those who need it. But definitely not for me.
If it is not to be purely imitative, Religion must spring from faith. As Faith is directly related to the "Non-physical Reality," A pre-requisite of Faith is an experience of the Non-physical reality in one's own life. Those of us who have had such an experience seek more, and also seek deeper understanding. Once understanding delivers one to acceptance of Devine Revelation, it becomes natural to look to the source of Revelation for guidance in matters Real, but Non-physical-have that is to say "Spiritual. The major Religions of the world have at core, reference to a Revelation in the Person of the Founder. So whether Abraham, the Buddah, whatever the name of the founder of Hinduism (lost in ancient antiquity),or Zoroaster, or Jesus , or Muhammad, it has been a "Person" who has led us to spiritual insight and growth.
Curiously, when one begins to compare the teachings of the Founders of the major Religions of the world, one soon discovers that there are far more similarities than differences. Further it can be discovered that all the Founders have referenced a "Person" who will appear in the future to establish World Peace through the implementation of spiritual principles
in every aspect of human life, from personal to international. Careful, prayerful,and reflective investigation of the life and teachings of Baha'u'llah has convinced me that He is, in fact, that Promised One. Consequently, I am Baha'i. Investigate the Baha'i Faith yourself: http://www.bahai.org/ And also: http://www.bahai.us/

To those who have not had an experience of the Non-physical Reality in their live, I can only say that it becomes possible only when you admit to the possiblity.
[this is good]
"Tiger got to hunt, bird got to fly;
Man got to sit and wonder, 'Why, why, why?'

Tiger got to sleep, bird got to land;
Man got to tell himself he understand."

Kurt Vonnegut
I wrote a bit of a <a href="http://ask.metafilter.com/58055/Meaning-in-a-Meaningless-world#872893">long reply</a> once on metafilter that basically wraps this up for me.

But I can summarize with the last paragraph of that post:
"I'm 41 now. I still have a lot of questions. I am still frustrated by the absurdities in life, but at the same time, they do amuse me to no end. I am an atheist now. If I had to state what I believe, I would say nothing. If anything, I would describe myself as a optimistic existentialist. For me, the only meaning life has is the one that I give it. And I had better give it a very, very good one since it's the only one I have."
I became a Christian because I'd become convinced that God existed, and could be known, but if I wanted to find Him I'd have to get on the path. But which path? I recalled something I read by Alan Watts in college, urging young spiritual seekers in the West during the 60s to explore their own religious heritage instead of turning to Eastern religions. He said that they could find the same things at home, with the advantage that Western religion is more easily comprehensible to the Western mind. You don't run into cultural obstacles that you do in Hinduism, Buddhism, etc.

I remain a Christian because that path did indeed lead me to God. I've come to see that exploring even a fraction of the Christian tradition can occupy a lifetime. As I've continued on the path (9 years so far), the type of Christian I am has changed. I'm finding that Catholic-Anglican faith and practice satisfies my need for a religion that speaks to the heart, mind, and body. My church provides me with the model for a strong community dedicated to living in peace and mutual love (with varying degrees of success, naturally.)

Also, I'm a big nerd; and if I'm going to go to church,I want it to be medieval, man - robes, bells, candles, bread, wine, incense, and all the rest of it.
I have always felt that it is wrong to put yourself inside a religion. To categorize the center of a humans belief (especially your own) into a single, defined, category is wrong. We, as individuals, are composed of a multitude of different inherent beleifs and, each day, we think hundreds of billions of indicidual thoughts. How can such a complex entity be forced (or force itself) into believing in a single, rigidly defined, set of concepts?

I am not advocating agnosticism because no one is really agnosticisim or aethiesm. For the later - everyone believes in something, even if it is a lack of existence of a God in favour of a "belief" in science. For the former - even if someone can't define what they believe in on a conscious level, everyone does have a core beleif which can summarise their being.

However, this core belief is very rarely in a religion or a God figure, it is most often in a set of core values. These values are what define us, what we place first when;

We look for a mate
We decide on our career
We choose our religion
Infact they define every significant choice in our lives. Why do people turn to organised religion then, when that so frequently fails to echoe their values? There are several reasons. One of them is habit - organised religion is a habit forming device, you see the religion is there, you feel the need to fill your life up with something and bind or constrain yourself to a set of beliefs so you go and join a church (particullarly an Abrahamic church). Another reason is solace - people can't face a universe in which they die and don't continue, so they look for a solution which will give them a purpose in the universe (Christianity - to serve God and leave a good life) so that they may acheive a certain state in the after life (Islam - Paradise & the Hells).

I advocate the abolition of all organised religion. Don't get me wrong - you can beleive whatever you wish - however the churches of today are forces more for corruption and degredation rather than salvation. Two good examples are;

The Christian TV Stations - working religion for every cent it is worth
Fundamentalists - Repressing the rights of women (in practicallyu every religion except Bhuddism)

I believe that people should return to the core of religion - certain people who share the same values sets getting togethor to do good works based on those values sets. It is important to realise that religion has abolished this. Without organised religion there would have been far less bloodshed throughout history and far less hatred would exist now. The organised religions have failed abjectly to do good works. I admit that there are certain orginisations attempting to do them, however, at this point these orginisations will never outway the human tragedies caused by them.

I am tired now. I might write more at a later date - I will certainly attempt to define my own values set.

~Shades
i am an athiest, simply because i know there is no such thing as a higher power - i believe that mankind needs to take responsibilty for its own triumphs, travails and tragedies - i am also of Indian descent, as well as an American and a New Zealander (a Kiwi) - if you put all these things together, you will still have not reached the essense of who i am, but you'd be closer:) - i am an organism on this planet, trying to survive and be happy - i choose not to believe in the unbelievable - i choose not to be a slave to other people's dogmas - that makes me a free woman


I am a Christian, for many reasons, but found a great quote today that perfectly expresses one of them: "The pattern should be clear. When serenity comes out of anxiety, joy out of depression, hope out of hopelessness; when good is returned for evil, forgiveness replaces retaliation, and courage triumphs over fear; then we recognize the movement of something beyond the personality and mental health. Such profound manifestations of the human spirit are the faces of the fourth dimension, which I have called the Holy." -- From Transforming the Moment by James E. Loder

well, how difficult it's to explain it in two or three words...i think that in every religion teaches to give all around you the fact that it's religion by its side...i'm buhddism and in me i feel that it's the best way i could think...i use to say buhdist choose me but it's not me choose buhddism...

eiric

Atheist.
Raised as a Christian but at about 12 I realised a few things, and just couldn't believe anymore. Conflicts over religion cause a lot of harm, so I just think it's easier to not believe.
I can't explain in only a few words why I got to the point where I am on this continuing journey. There have been times in the past where there was no involvement in the church and times of hyper-involvement... times when I questioned whether or not God was a fiction created by people who just needed to believe that mortal humans happened as more than the existence of any other creature... a rationalization of why humans could "rightfully" claim ownership and control of the planet...

I have been a part of several Christian traditions, as well as studying the belief structures of many others.

The reason I am now aligned with the description of faith that there IS a GOD that I am now bound to is because that identity has become my life's blood. I may not agree with all who wear the same label, but I like to attribute the diversity to the vastness of the God I believe in. How could the mind of one person such as myself, ever be so arrogant as to believe he or she reflects COMPLETELY, the FULL person of God, even if the ancient scriptures say that human-kind was made in the "likeness" of God?

On a more practical note, my faith orders my priorities, how I interact with the world and WHAT I am attuned to look for.

I have a personal theory that people WILL find whatever they are looking for. Want to find evil? BAM... there it is. Want to find God? WOW!... EVERYWHERE.

This part is OUTSIDE the teachings of the Christian Church, to which I cling: If I can believe that ALL people were created by God and that I alone can't fathom the vastness of that creator, what says God could not speak to different peoples of diverse cultures over the course of time, in the way EACH would best hear, based on each people's understanding of the world and of God?

I for one think that MOST people of faith are just a scattered children, connecting with the same VAST creator in the vocabulary that allows them that access.

I would hate to take up an argument with some of my brothers and sisters and ACCEPT that such is NOT the purpose of this thread... for which I give thanks.

In Christian teaching ( that is MY connection to faith), the words of scripture indicate that Jesus said that no person comes to the father except by him. I can agree fully with that... but what some are not willing to accept is that these ancient texts were FILLED with literary devices that spoke to the people of the time in ways we could only now guess at.

A common translation of this text in modern times would say that none can come to the creator without being Christian. However, a different interpretation would say that this passage was intended to be understood as saying that any who come before the creator personality of the vastness of God will also find the merciful nature of God ( as was made incarnate in the person of Jesus) as well.

I don't believe ANY of us have the ability to understand the magnitude of what the simple three-letter word "GOD" that we throw about so carelessly represents.

I espouse a trinitarian view of God, not just because Christianity is the prevailing expression of faith in my part of the world, but because it makes sense to me that people of human nature would wish to "break God down" into terms we can understand better. In saying this, I do NOT say that I do not believe the tenants of Christian doctrine... I DO believe them... only that I ALSO think mankind has attempted to reduce such teachings ( in some senses) to a vending machine... if you say this, no matter what is really in your heart, out pops a key to the kingdom.

I DON'T believe THAT. The TRUE key to the kingdom of God ( in my eyes) is not something we get by just saying the right words. First and foremost, that key is a gift... yes... but not to unlock the pearly gates where St. Peter stands guard... that key is for the unlocking of our hearts.

I LOVE the faith tradition that allows me to find God on levels that are not all pre-determined for me... a tradition that though there IS structure, does not say I have to believe EXACTLY like another or that I will burn in the flaming pits of hell for having ever questioned.

I am a devout Christian who believes in the VERY Christ-like effort of reconciliation. There may be things I can't take on as personal view-point of God, but that does not mean that I can't feel relationship with brothers and sisters who are following a different path. We may enrich each other greatly if we will only take time to listen to each other.

Well, I am a pagan as far as religious title goes, but that is because it is more of an umbrella term than anything. There are so many traditions and there are some many different perspectives... and they are all beautiful and they are all beautiful together... like the threads of a tapestry. When you get down to the basic trend of all religions... it is the faith that there is something more to life then being born, eating, sleeping, mating, and then dying. Even people with out a "faith" so to speak... believe in something more... like atoms, gravity, air, stars, the universe, black holes, history, and so on. I consider myself pagan because practice and have faith in many religions or portions of them.

I do believe in magic and metaphysics and the power of prayer, but I think all these things are the same... just different ways of doing it. I believe in a higher power... but I don't think it is a definable being... I think it is everything and nothing and everywhere and no where. I think gods and goddesses, God, Satan, the Dream Relm, the universal unconsious, myths, and so on are the results of human beings trying to define the same thing. Take the cat for example... people who speak english call it a cat, in spanish a gato, in japanese a neko, or in german katze... what I am trying to say is that people all over the world see one thing and give it a name.

Its a feeling of connection... of energy dancing everywhere... and of the wonder and mystery of life. I have found that Paganism, Wicca, Witchcraft, Druidism, Shamanism, and so on are more excepting of others. Maybe it is because of the hardships and the stuggle to continue their teachings have made these groups realize... it's the same thing... just a different name. And with different cultures comes different customs. And different perspectives. And different focuses...different needs. And the needs and wants have changed with the soical evolution and technological advances that have been made... but they are still there.

I have felt the glory of sunset from a mountain top, I have cry with joy in the pouring rain, I have seen people leave their mortal vessels knowing that they continue on, I have seen spirits in a graveyard fog, I have felt the life pulse of a forest. Yes I do believe in faeries and other creatures that are of a mythological nature... I do believe there is magic in music and cooking and chanting and herds and teas.

I believe the world is full of magic and life and promise.

I believe in a lot of things... don't you?

I believe in God but i don't believe in religion, is that okay? I was raised as a Muslim but i never consider myself as one. But when i think about the judgement day, about Mahdi, about the return of Jesus, about Dajjal. It frighten me. Will i be the fllower of Dajjal the anti-christ? I want to believe and yet i'm not :(
[this is good]
I am putting my religious roots down into Buddhism. Buddha was a man who overcame worldly attachments through the development of compassion and the ability to love all and that is a virtue that I hold dear.

I was brought up as a Christian and love Jesus's teachings of love one another, etc. But yes I would see the hypocrisy in people once they had left the church doors every Sunday. Also the Old Testament was very off putting. As is the fact that so many wars have been waged in the name of Christianity and other religions.

Now I know that Buddhism is not perfect, but it appears to be a lot less hypocritical and its universal aproach is to develop compassion and love for everyone no matter who they are, even the tiniest of insects.

Many of the common "modern" psychological therapies such as Cognitive Behavoural Therapy (CBT) are actually very close to the psychology of Buddhism. One of the common sayings in Buddhism is, "Be your own therapist". It is about taking control of who we are and taking responsibility for our actions, rather than blaming others for all of our problems. I love that aspect of Buddhism.

Buddhists aren't even into converting people to their religion, they advise people that if their religion works for them then stick with it.

Also as Buddhists we should question all of our teachings and if we find that it doesn't hold true for us then we should reject it.

So for me I guess I must have that spiritual gene planted inside of me, as I feels like there needs to be something more. I don't believe it is because I am weak and I need a crutch, it is just something inside of me that yearns for more.

So yes I will talk about peace and harmony because I really want it for this world and its people and that is why I like Buddhism as I relate to it. It upsets me when I see other religions tearing each other apart and at the same time tearing this world apart and it doesn't have to be this way.

Now that I have said where I lie as far as my religious beliefs are, I am happy to say that I will have the opportunity to see H.H. The 14th Dalai Lama on the 7th June in Bendigo.

I was baptized Catholic, but missed out on my First Holy Communion and later my Confirmation due to my parent's divorce and my mom taking a break from the church after she was somewhat shunned (during the 1960's & 70's). My grandparents, however, often took me to their church and so I say I was raised Catholic. As an adult, I would attend Catholic church every now and then and on the major holy days. Because I was never confirmed, I did not take part in the Eucherist and that always bothered me. I was married in a historic Lutheran Church (my husband's family is Lutheran) that was so beautiful & ornate in its architecture, I felt like I was in a Catholic church. Later, my husband & I joined the United Church Of Christ Church in our neighborhood. We loved the strong commmunity feel there. My first son was baptized there. My daughter was baptized at a UCC church in Kauai, HI on a long family vacation. I always felt like something was missing at the UCC church though. I missed the symbolism, rituals and emphasis on the sacraments of the Catholic Church. So, when we moved to the small town we live in outside of Seattle, I went to Mass at the local Catholic Church. What a breath of fresh air from what I remember from my childhood. No fire & brimstone homily...instead, messages of loving your neighbor as Jesus loves, kindess, compassion. I went a second time, a third, & so on. I was intrigued - the Priest seemed almost liberal compared to what I was raised with. Long story, short (oops - too late for that! sorry!) I decided to be confirmed Catholic. A few years later, my husband went through RCIA to become Catholic too. But only after he tested it, poked it, and asked the most difficult questions he could think of. I never guessed in a million years we would have both decided to be "Catholics". But it is the path was meant to be (that is another very long story). Now with three young children, it is very nice to be "on the same page" as far as our beliefs go. I do not want to "cram" any religion down my kid's throats, though. So, I try to show them what others believe as well and when they are of age, they can decide for themselves. That said, I am also highly interested in Buddhism. I have been for the past 10 years. Yet, I haven't had any encounters with other buddhists. Most of what I know is from reading books on my own. Buddhism has helped me to stay present and to accept what is. It also connects to many of my reasons for being a vegetarian. Buddhist principles make so much sense to me and I do not find any conflicts with it as a Catholic.To me saying the rosary is very similiar to meditating. I like to do both. To sum it up, Buddhism & going to church bring a sense of peace & well being into my life.

I believe in God, because the existence of an ultimate reality that has revealed itself as Personal makes the most sense to me of:

(a) My subjective experience of life, love and meaning, and

(b) My objective experience of an evolving universe capable of generating complex sentient life and mind out of relatively simple insentient energy and matter

I believe that God has revealed Himself or Herself in each of the major religions of the world, and indeed anywhere we find truth, beauty and goodness in significant measure

I am a Christian because I see God most clearly revealed in the face of Christ as he suffers on the cross, and takes upon Himself the suffering of humanity in the ultimate act of self-giving love

I am a Protestant because I believe that salvation is a free gift from God, not able to be earned by us in any way by means of meritorious works, but simply able to be received by us by faith as we finally surrender in brokenness to the Ground of our Being, which is Love

I am reformed because I believe that even this faith and surrender is itself a gift of God, an inevitable response of the human heart to the irresistible grace of a God who has chosen us in Him before the foundation of the world

I am a believer in Universalism, because I believe that all human beings, and indeed the totality of the Cosmos itself, is elect in Christ to be the recipient of that final and irrevocable salvation, where the meaninglessness of death will finally be overcome, and the God of Love will be All in All

I am an Agnostic Freethinker and write from that point of view. This post discusses various tools that I use to develop inner peace and promote peace within others. All the tools discussed within this post are available for any person to use irrespective of religious belief or lack thereof.
I take from ALL spiritual paths without prejudice, my only requirement is that the religious or spiritual tool be one that offers peace. Any tool always has to pass the peace test, this way it speaks of a 'higher authority' than just man made dogma - it speaks of universal truth.

I was discussing 'spiritual aspects of living' on various online forums. One group was a dedicated atheists discussion list with most members only offering bitter personal attacks instead of adding anything substantive to the discussion.

But to be fair to these atheists, I've known many a religious fellow that are just as bitter, if not more so, than atheists I meet. So just being 'religious' is not a guarantee of being at peace.

Each man made religion contains perfection's as well as imperfections. It is up to the practitioner or end user to use the tools in the right way.
The problem is not the wisdom that is defective.
The problem lies with religious practitioners who are defective in their practice of this wisdom.
The wisdom works - we don't work the wisdom.

Many times we are too busy for peace. As one atheist list member wrote, 'It took awhile - far too long, really - but I've finally found that one can find peace by simply being undisturbed."
Yes, peace is our birthright, if we are not destroying it by our own actions. In order to slow down enough to be able to use peace as a tool I needed to apply simplicity and renunciation to my life.
I am not an acetic or total renunciate by any means, but I did have to let go of many peace destroying habits before making room for inner peace to enter my life. As we get rid of one thing, it make room for another thing to enter.
The online discussions based in bitterness brought up the question of "what guiding light do atheists use to be at peace?"
Not much was offered in reply to my question. I got a few answers here or there.
It seems whenever the discussion turns to 'inner peace' many of the people I talk with are silent, this even goes for 'pious' Catholic priests.
But, one fellow on the forum mentioned 'truth and philosophy,' as his tools - both of these being good answers for peace generation with proper application. Philosophy plays a big role in my life as well for providing tools to live at peace.
I also supplement my spiritual path from many other sources as I will go into below. I am only interested in practical application of philosophy though and not bickering and arguing over the unanswerable. So, I prefer truth based discussions over ego based discussions where the truth gets overshadowed by rhetoric. As someone once wrote ... "if you don't know the answer then just say so."
see:
I was at a philosophy symposium last year and talked with a professor about a teaching / mentor relationship he had with Ayn Rand.
He went on to say how after a year they broke up the mentor relationship on a sour note. After I questioned the professor about Rand's personal life as well as her state of inner peace and happiness, I could see that with all her talents of 'smarts' she was bankrupt when the subject turned to peace smarts, contentment and happiness.
She was ego based and not practice based when it came to peace generation.
Furthermore, she not only destroyed her peace, but from the information that came out of our discussion, the then student's peace was disturbed at the time and it still sounded disturbed decades later as a distinguished professor and author. Academic smarts are not the same as peace smarts.
The branch of philosophy that deals with the study of ethics and virtue has also helped me along in life.
What is virtue and ethics?
Some authorities define it as 'excellence of the soul' or moral excellence. (Although the Greeks thought of 'soul and form' in different terms than say Christians think of soul. For example, the soul of an eye would be its ability to 'see' and whether this ability was good or bad would decide whether the soul of an eye had 'virtue' or excellence.)
The concept for understanding virtue can be told in a story of the 'Ring of Gyges' or 'Myth of Gyges'. This story was taken from Plato's Republic and recounts how the shepherd Gyges finds a ring on a hand extending from a crack in the earth and removes the ring from the hand and puts it on. Gyges discovers the magic ring gives him powers to be invisible at will and then uses these powers to kill the king, rape the queen and take over the kingdom. As James Allen tells us in "As A Man Thinketh" - "Circumstances does not make the man - it reveals him to himself"
What is virtuous behavior in a flourishing human being?
In readily understandable terms we can help define virtue for us from this story of Gyges and by asking ourselves the question, "What would we do if no one was looking or we knew we would not get caught?"
No heaven, no hell, no God, no karma, no police, nothing but us and our virtue?
Would our actions promote our inner peace as well as the inner peace of others or would our actions destroy our peace and the peace of others?
Virtue is not learned from the classroom, other than memorizing definitions. Remember, a fool can only say what he knows ~ it takes a wise man to know what he says.
How do we become a success at living a virtuous life and really know what we say?
As a lecture on Aristotle mentioned: "We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act but a habit." We develop it by practice. Practicing 'excellence of the human soul' is how.
Beside the philosophical studies of ethics and virtue, a Buddhist or Taoist practice is another good peace developer for anyone to adopt whether atheist, agnostic or believer.
Buddhists are generally not required to believe or not believe in God, so anyone can make use of this philosophy irrespective of their religious beliefs or lack thereof.
But be careful with your Buddhist studies if you decide to head in this direction. For Buddhism is riddled with useless ego based dogma. If you can sift through the useless as a freethinker and find the gems you will do well.
See:
Personally, I've settled on the essence of Buddhism and that is what I work on and find much peace with this type of simplified Buddhist practice.
"The Three Pillars of Buddhism"
1- Practicing mindfulness and meditation to develop peace and self awareness of our own true nature.

2- Accepting the liberating wisdom of impermanence and practicing non-clinging and a lessening of craving and desires.
3- The development of compassion for others.
In addition to the three pillars, we can use the eightfold path to guide us. Within the three pillars and the eightfold path are a lifetime of practice.
No need to get lost in endless debate and spend your precious time in idle talk that only serves to massage one's ego. Plenty of work to do right here, right now, unless we prefer to keep our minds distracted through our perpetual complexities we are so addicted to.
We do need to give some thought of the 'right' way to live as the eightfold path tells us, so we should never try and be devoid of thought in our lives, but instead look for a balance and let thought serve us for once.
"The Eightfold Path"
1. Right View
2. Right Intention
3. Right Speech
4. Right Action
5. Right Livelihood
6. Right Effort
7. Right Mindfulness
8. Right Concentration
How can you differentiate right from wrong?
By peace.
You learn what destroys your peace and the peace of others as well as what promotes you inner peace and the inner peace of others. Do you need a teacher for that? Or the Pope to tell you? Or just listen to peace as the best teacher?
The Five precepts are the 'commandments' more or less for Buddhists. Although you are not commanded to do a thing. If you wish to live at peace, then proceed the best you can - but it is your choice.
"The Five Precepts"
1. Refrain from Killing
2. Refrain from Stealing
3. Refrain from Sexual Misconduct
4. Refrain from False Speech
5. Refrain from the Use of Intoxicants
Once I am at peace, I can share with others about finding peace for themselves, which is the secondary reason I practice.
I have no interest in practicing Buddhism for extinguishing reincarnation. These "fear based" reasons for being a Buddhist are not authentic or natural - the persons actions are based on fear or negative consequences otherwise they would not do them. My actions are based on inner peace and if I stray - there goes my peace - it is my choice.
Remember what I wrote about above with the myth of Gyges?
Take away the fear of pain of karma or hell and you have a different person?
A truly virtuous life remains the same irrespective of such fears and is not based on them.
I enjoy life and realize that due to natural law, suffering comes about as part of the process and I accept it as a fair trade off for the privilege of living.
Buddhism helps makes this trade off of life and pain more in my favor by lending me support to live a life at peace. I do not practice Buddhism to earn merit for the next life - I practice Buddhism for my own peace generation in THIS LIFE.
You see, once a religion requires faith, this is where I leave off with it's teaching.
I only use the tools that can be applied in this life that can be tested to yield peace.
Otherwise, if I succumb to fantasy notions I start heading towards the road of delusion.
So whether it is heaven, hell, reincarnation or chanting 'Namo Amitabha Buddha' for the Buddha to carry me off to the pure land...none of this can be proven as fact and is just based on ego based man and their fantasies.
Still, I am not shy about benefiting from any religious path that offers tools for me to live at peace.
I take from ALL spiritual paths without prejudice, my only requirement is that the religious or spiritual tool be one that offers peace. Any tool always has to pass the peace test, this way it speaks of a 'higher authority' than just man made dogma - it speaks of universal truth.
See:
But, this all has to be done in balance.
For there are many true things that are good - but done in excess they become bad.
For, even though air and water give us life, they will also give us death when in excess.
So always seek balance.
How flexible can you be when it comes to finding tools for living at peace within the worlds spiritual paths?
Even though I am not a Muslim, I borrowed from the Muslim's prayer schedule to use myself. The Muslims have a practice of praying five times a day to Allah. For those that do not know, Allah is the same God of the Jews and of the Old Testament that the Christians worship.
The Muslims pray at sun up, when the sun is at its zenith at noon, when the sun is part way down in the afternoon, when the sun sets and when they go to bed. Even though I am not a Muslim, I borrowed from the Muslim's prayer schedule to use as a reminder to be mindful of "gratitude" in my life.
If you do not want to develop a practice of gratitude, then what about using it as a reminder 5 times a day to relax your breath, practice mindfulness and bring your thoughts back to the present moment? When you have come to a point of gratitude for being able to open your eyes in the morning and being able to take a breath of air everything else is just gravy so to speak. Gratitude plays an important part with finding inner peace, just as being mindful of the present moment and being aware of anything that causes this mindfulness to wander.
If I could define the basis of my spiritual practice it would be that of peace and practicality. Inner peace is the foundation of it all, for we cannot have world peace without first being at peace within. I used to be a Catholic for many years of my life as well as a freethinking Buddhist before becoming an agnostic freethinker.
See::
A few years ago a lady moderator on a Christian forum banned me for claiming that God is peace, telling me "you don't know who God is."
Funny thing about the Christians. I was a Christian as well as a freethinking Buddhist in my earlier life and 100% of the Christian forums have banned me, and 95% of the Buddhist forums have also banned me.
This says something about the Christians and Buddhists and whether they practice what they preach? The Christians chanting the Golden rule of Reciprocity and Charity and Humility? and the Buddhists preaching Compassion, Do No Harm and Egoless Non-Self?
Why am I banned so much?
Is it for getting in fights or flame wars?
No...I get banned for writing about truth.
See:
When someone disagrees with you, apply the law of opposites to get at the truth.
This removes the personalities and focusses on the principles and helps you see the entire picture.
If God is not peace, then God must be the opposite of peace...turmoil and unrest.
I prefer to believe God is peace and God is the authority on the subject of peace.
The difference between an authority and an authoritarian is this. An authority speaks from a place of truth and such speaks as an authority. Whereas an authoritarian rules by fear and not by truth. For the truth stands on it own and the authoritarian stands on their ego.
See:
The Buddhists have a set of rules they use to determine what are definitive truths and what are not. This can also be applied to such questions.
1) Do not rely on just the person but rely on the doctrine.
2) With respect to the doctrine, do not rely on just the words, but rely on the meaning.
3) With respect to the meaning, do not rely on just meaning requiring interpretation, but rely on meaning that is definitive.
4) With respect to definitive meaning, do not rely on just dualistic understanding but rely on the wisdom of the direct perception of the truth.
Bringing this worship business back to the topic of religion, do we worship a higher power out of fear for if we do not worship this higher power we will be killed?
Sounds like the aliens in an old "Superman" movies that came to earth to tell us to bow down to them or else?
If there was a God or a higher power does this entity need us to 'bow down' to a 'big ego' or does God need us to 'act right' to our companions as well as to act right to ourselves?
Bowing down produces no peace, whether in the person that demands it due to an over bloated ego, nor does it foster peace within the person forced to worship against their will. But this is how man made religions work - they are run by fear, greed and ego.
I prefer to be truth and peace based. Many think God is like 'Santa Claus' and must come through with their demands, just as we did as greedy children making up a long, impossible list for Santa to fill. This smacks of the ego based practitioner.
See:
The ego based person prays thinking they know better than God does.
The truly spiritual based person prays for God's will and not their own, for if they truly knew better than God...the practitioner would be the God.
Nothing wrong with asking if one is a believer, but always end such requests humbly with accepting Gods or a higher powers will with gratitude.
Can you imagine if everyone's prayers were answered according to our self centered and conflicting demands? The world would be in real turmoil then.
No, I prefer to make the God of Peace and the God of Nature two Gods I serve and as such my actions can be evaluated in simple terms of bringing me in harmony with these two Gods or not.
See:
Many times we violate the three branches of laws that govern us and constantly ask God or a higher power to give us 'hall passes' to avoid the consequences of our actions. Such prayer is again ego based, thinking we should have preference over the rest of the world for wishing to be exempt from our actions
We are all governed by these three areas of laws.
1 - Natural Law
2 - Divine or spiritual law (if you believe in spiritual matters)
3 - Manmade laws
I find that sometime spiritual practitioners neglect the natural laws that govern our bodies and suffer in this area from lack of living a balanced life.
Some of us forget we are spiritual beings residing in physical bodies living in physical world and governed my both spiritual and physical or natural laws in addition to man made laws.
We need some effort with spiritual work and some effort in physical work for a good balance. Some of us think we can defy man made laws as well as divine or spiritual laws.
But no matter how defiant the person is...we all answer to natural law. We all bow to nature in the end.
Anyway, you are free to think or not think of God or higher power as you see fit. I am only a 'minor authority' on peace and do not wish to be an authoritarian, so I allow freedom for all to think as they wish and only ask the same courtesy be extended to me - reciprocity.
Psychologist William James once said, "A great many people believe they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices."
This applies to atheists as well as the religious or the pious. To avoid prejudice, we have to be careful of 'black or white' absolutes if you claim to truth based and not ego based in your beliefs. I work to keep an open mind for all religions as well as those persons that believe nothing.
When I discussed Christian principles one time an Atheist piped up to say "the Christians have no principles," and "Jesus was a fabled creation of the Christians."
When we sperate the personalities from the principles it makes looking at things much easier. When I am referring to Christian principles I speak of such things as charity, works of mercy and the golden rule, where the emphasis is on principles and not on the personalities of the church.
For even if Jesus was just created as a fable, these Christian principles are universal truths in their own right if one desires to live a life at peace and promote the inner peace of others in this world. Is it any different from the Taoists following the legend of Lao Tzu? Always look at what is said and not at who says what this divorces the personalties and prejudice from your search for truth.
"The Corporal Works of Mercy"
To feed the hungry
To give drink to the thirsty
To clothe the naked
To harbour the harbourless
To visit the sick
To ransom the captive
To bury the dead
"The Spiritual Works of Mercy"
To instruct the ignorant
To counsel the doubtful
To admonish sinners
To bear wrongs patiently
To forgive offenses willingly
To comfort the afflicted
To pray for the living and the dead
You see, by applying the rule of reciprocity or rule of opposites we can see if we were in these positions of the needy mentioned above, we would like such charity bestowed on us for the most part. What about our children, parents and loved ones? Wouldn't we wish the same for them? We have no loved ones? What about our neighbors?
The Christian ethic says to treat one another as we would wish to be treated. As we give ~ so we receive. Even if an atheist, as we give peace - we receive inner peace as many of the tools I mentioned above do not require belief in God, they only requirement is a desire to be at peace and to bring peace to others. This is the Christian doctrine in a nutshell, when we put principles before personalities.
As you instill seeds of peace within others you plant the same seeds and water these seeds within you as well. As James Allen wrote in "As a man Thinketh" ~ To think well of all, to be cheerful with all, to patiently learn to find the good in all - such unselfish thoughts are the very portals of heaven; and to dwell day by day in thoughts of peace toward every creature will bring abounding peace to their possessor."
This is universal truth that transcends man made religions.
Remember, we do not have to do it perfectly. Just look for direction and forget perfection - for perfection or range is of the ego and form is of the soul.
There are many tools for peace within the worlds spiritual paths, no one said these paths are perfect, in fact, it was once said that walking the spiritual path is akin to walking on a razors edge. But if we bother to be honest, non prejudicial and to look, we can find tools that can help us be at peace whether atheist, agnostic or believer.
In the Gnostic gospel of Thomas, it was reported:
"The disciples asked Jesus, when will the kingdom come? Jesus replied, 'The kingdom will not come by watching for it. It will not be said - look here or look there. Rather, the kingdom of heaven is spread out upon the earth and men do not see it."
What does this quote mean for the atheist as well as the religious minded person?
For the atheist or as a nonbeliever of an afterlife:
THIS LIFE IS IT - This life is either heaven or hell as you make it. Just grabbing all the gusto you can will not give you peace.
It requires much more than that - for greed is never satisfied by attainment, it is only satisfied by contentment. We are reminded to be mindful of each moment given to us and to be grateful for this life. Being of service to others and charitable actions help lead us to contentment and peace.
There are 3 components for a happy life: Contentment, love or compassion and gratitude. When we realize that happiness and contentment are there for the taking and that they are independent from our circumstances it sometimes can sink in that there is nothing stopping us from being content and happy this very instant.
It is your choice alone as to whether you make this life one of peace for yourself and others or not, but in either case you will reap what you sow. "Just as a life of virtue yields its own reward, a life of vice yields its own punishment" - Plutarch
For the religious minded person and believer in an afterlife:
Jesus' saying will foreshadow things to come. For if we make this earthly life hell for ourselves and others, we have a slim chance of doing better in an afterlife. Just paying lip service to religious principles and doing the opposite will not do it.
Again mindfulness of our actions is most important. An old Buddhist saying sheds some light on our journey "when one eye is kept on the destination, it only leaves one eye left for the journey." If we keep fixated on the after life, and can't find peace in the present life, we can lose sight of the fact that our actions can turn the present moment in a living hell for us as well as others.
Actions speak louder than words and this especially applies to such religious beliefs. By applying the rule of reciprocity and Christian ethics and charity we have better chance at entering any afterlife and in the interim help make this life a peaceful one for all that dwell on earth.

So, whether you are on either end of this spectrum of beliefs, the choices are the same as to the direction we take when it comes to inner peace.
The seeds of enlightenment are all around us - we only have to seek the truth and come to peace within to realize this.
A quote on finding peace from Thich Nhat Hanh
"There is no way to peace, peace is the way.
This means that we can realize peace right here in the present moment with our look, our smile, our words and our actions.
Peace work in not a means, each step we take should be peace.
Every step we take should be joy.
Every step we take should be happiness.
Are you massaging Mother Earth every time your foot touches her?
Are you planting seeds of joy and peace?
Enlightenment, peace and joy will not be granted by someone else.
The well is within us and if we dig deeply in the present moment the water will spring forth.
If we are determined, we can do it.
We don't need the future.
We can smile, breath fully and relax Everything we want is here in the present moment.
Peace is every step.
Shall we continue our journey?"
Take care,


V (Male)

Agnostic Freethinker
Practical Philosopher
[this is good]
Before I knew about this blog, which I think is great, I'd written this. It nicely sums up my view.
[this is good]

I'm Pagan because I'm my own person...I'm unique.

Before anyone says, "duh," let me clarify:

I don't have a complete and irrevocable set of rules for my life or how I do things. I don't live well in utter structure. I need a little chaos and a little mystery.

I'm also more girl/woman-centered than anything else...and Paganism allows me to deal directly with the deities/powers/energies I find most comforting and/or valid.

And one of the most important reasons why I identify as Pagan is because I generally have very strong opinions about things and I decide stuff for myself. I can't abide having someone tell me what exactly I have to believe. I want to learn and discover and find out for myself... I want to KNOW for myself.

To me, Paganism allows that.

[this is good]
Great goodness this is long.

I'm Asatruar because ever since I've been gaining more awareness of the world around me, certain things have been cycling around and coming back to me: a kinship to nature and the Earth, a love of cool, foggy mornings, weird moments when I feel an alignment to fire, ice, the wind, lightning, etc....

Most of all a strong connection to Thor; from learning more about Thor I saw just how much we had in common, from our inclinations to some of the things we've done, and how every time I depict some evil or negative force in art or literature, it's always a giant serpent... and then I learned about Jormungandr.

Plus, when I began learning abour the runes and how to read them, it all came so naturally, much easier for me to work with than crystal ball scrying or tarot cards. Something was definitely clicking for me there, so I stuck with it, and I've been sticking with it ever since.

I don't associate to a single religion.

Religions are simply a particular point of view of the same thing.

Most have some, similar, basis. Some facts in common. But the need to 'be right' overrides the Universal Need to share knowledge, and understand one another.

I think all the religions have something correct, but by binding yourself to 'Beliefs' to the exclusion of new information, stating that everyone else is 'wrong' you prevent yourself from Growing. Just because of a Label, or Fear. Spiritual Growth, and Growth as an Individual is more important than 'fitting in'

If you are limiting yourself because of your 'beliefs' what good are they? Ideas are fine, those can change with new information. Goals can be made, raised, and otherwise changed, as you get better. But Beliefs tend to be tricky, because you put so much Weight to them.

Try NOT believing, instead try Thinking, Asking, Questioning, And Learning for yourself, NOT just believing in what One book Tells you to Think.

Just my Opinion though... I wouldn't want to Tell you what to Believe...

[this is good]

Excellent question! I'm afraid I won't answer it as eloquently as many of you have, but I felt the need to contribute my viewpoint.

I was raised Catholic, but the beliefs never felt right to me. Too often, I found a sense of "We're right and everyone else is wrong... and is going to Hell for it." It didn't seem right that this wonderful God would condemn people to Hell for not believing in Him... seemed rather egotistical, in my opinion. I also thought... if there is a God, where's the Goddess? If we're made in His image, why not Her's too? I was young, but the questions never went away.

It was when I first chatted with a Pagan (many years ago, on the day I first got on the Internet) that I had an "a-ha!" moment. I had finally found a name for what I had believed all along.

I am so impressed with the lovely way each person has explained their views and beliefs.

I am Wiccan. I have studied many religions and facets of these religions (for example, I have been Protestant as a child, then Methodist, as a slightly older child, have been to Catholic mass many times, have been a guest to Temple with a Jewish friend, have book studied Hindu and Muslim, have looked into Buddism through books and a friend who practiced) and found that none of them really fit my beliefs.

I belive there is a greater power, but have an issue beleiving that some person, many thousands of years ago, wrote something that a divine being told them, and through many translations, it has stayed the same. I have yet to meet 10 people, when trying to pass information down the "telephone", can effectively share the message. I also have trouble accepting that, even though the ancient stories of different cultures share a great number of factors, that different religions fight about who's right. There can not be one right answer.

I finally found myself drifting toward a more pagan viewpoint and found, through discussions on our beliefs, that many of my friends were pagan.

This started a new set of studies. I have read many articles and books on "what a pagan is" and "what wicca means" and foudn myself to "fit" with the Wiccan beliefs best.

I feel that every thing has a unique spirit or vibration that links it to the world. The Oceans have a set spirit, the sand on the beach has a different spirit, your pets, the tree in the park by your home, all have, for lack of a better term, a spirit to add to the world.

I thank these spirits everyday for the love my cats give me when they wake me in the morning, when I catch a glimpse of my Mexican Petunia in full bloom, when the breeze blows on a particularly hot day, or when I see the full moon gently lighting up the world.

Very simple answer: In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." (God who spoke the heavens and earth into existence) "On the seventh day God had finished his work of creation, so he rested* from all his work."
(What God rested from was the work of Creation. He continues constantly to be active sustaining all that he has created.)
Matthew 11:28 Then Jesus said, “Come to me, all of you who are weary and carry heavy burdens, and I will give you rest.

[this is good]
It is nice to see the sharing of such a wide range of beliefs without the subsequent inflammatory responses which seem to be all too prevalent in online religious discussions. I commend you Spiritseeker for attracting a good community.

I believe in the tenets and claims of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, commonly known as the Mormon Church. I believe primarily because of the Book of Mormon. I have studied the text and its associated history and find it impossible to dismiss as mere fiction. I also have had a wide range of personal 'spiritual experiences' that I cannot explain simply as a creation of my own mind. I continue in this path because of a sense of integrity, acting according to what I view as knowledge, as well as because of the richness/heightening of senses/beauty/enrichment of interpersonal relationships that has come into my life due to the worldview and community associated with this faith.
[this is good]
I was raised in a Christian family, but I am a born-again Pagan.
[this is good]
Sorry, it published before I was finished. I practice Wicca because it fits closely with the beliefs I already had but couldn't fit with Christianity, like reincarnation. I also deeply disliked the dogma that, in order to get into heaven, you had to accept Christ as savior. My fiance is a very good man and an atheist.

Some Christians might call me fickle or say that I was never truly a Christian, because I changed religions. But I would say to them: Being raised in a particular religion does not mean that it is the right religion for me.

I believe that the force that created the Universe - whether you call it God, the Source, or whatever - accepts and welcomes the myriad of ways it is possible to worship it.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Advertisement

  • Powered by Vox